![]() |
Publications and Bibliographies | ![]() |
|
If you have any comments or suggestions about these informational postings, or any questions on cataloging which you would like answered, please send them to the Subject and Bibliographic Access Committee. The Committee is always looking for more questions for this monthly column. From "Mountain Whites" to "Appalachians (People)": A Description of the Journey, Concluding with a Brief Sermon When I first became involved with Appalachian Studies librarianship,
I soon became aware of the Library of Congress Subject Heading (LCSH)
term for the people of our region (I say "our" both because
I work in Appalachian Studies and because I am, as a native of the region,
one of the discipline's subjects). This term "Mountain Whites"
was universally disliked by those of the region and by scholars who studied
it. The people and the scholars alike felt that LC's assignment of this
term was just another example of how Appalachia and her people have been
marginalized, economically and socially, from the rest of America. Proposal form: (*) Your name: Fred J. Hay (*) Your e-mail address: hayfj@appstate.edu (*) Subject heading/preferred term: Appalachians Cross-reference term: BT: Appalachian people (Southern States) Cross-reference term: BT: Mountain people--Southern States Cross-reference term: BT: Ethnology--Appalachian Region Cross-reference term: UF: Mountain whites (Southern States) [former heading] (*) Citation of publication about this subject (please fill in ALL the information below) Author: Charles Reagan Wilson and William Ferris, coeditors Title: Encyclopedia of Southern Culture Place of publication: Chapel Hill, NC Publisher: University of North Carolina Press Date of publication: 1989 If the term you are requesting is not part of the title, please list the page/pages that describe the term and paraphrase or quote the description. Page(s): p. 418 Description: Article titled "Appalachians" by sociologist Dwight Billings Citation of reference publications that list the term Citation of reference publications that list the term Citation of reference publications that list the term Citation of web sites that list the term Comments/additional reference publications that list the term: In 1899, the Reverend Robert Campbell wrote: "A great deal of what has been written about 'the mountain whites of the South' has excited bitterness and resentment among them. This is due partly to sweeping and indiscriminate statements, partly to the bad odor that always emanates from a class appellation that seems to imply peculiarity, if not inferiority." And again in 1901, Campbell wrote "because there is something about the name, or its association, that savors of condescension." In 1914, Samuel Tyndale Wilson wrote: "A nomenclature that is objectionable to the persons named should, in courtesy, be modified to remove all unnecessary offense. Some writers have gotten into the habit of calling us modern Appalachies "mountain whites," a term that implies peculiarity and, inferentially, inferiority. We are not deeply in love with that nomenclature. It sounds too much like 'poor white trash,' the most opprobrious term known in the South. We do not like this color label process any more than country school boys enjoy being called 'greenies' by their city cousins. There are no mountain blacks, or browns, or yellows. Fancy how it would sound to hear the inhabitants of the Buckeye State spoken of as "Ohio whites"! In 1921, John C. Campbell wrote of the term mountain whites: "This opprobrious term, coined as a term of distinction by well-meaning advocates of the mountaineer, is resented by all who dwell in the Highlands, by whatever name they may be designated." Yet, in 1922, H.H.B. Meyer, Chief Bibliographer of the Library of Congress
compiled and published his "List of References on the Mountain Whites"
and the Library of Congress Subject Headings to this day includes "Mountain
Whites" as the appropriate heading by which to designate the light-skinned
inhabitants of the southern mountains. Other ethnic groups have successfully
lobbied LC to change subject headings which they find offensive or outdated
(e.g., from Negro to Afro-American to African American). Mountain Whites
is not only offensive to those to whom it is applied but it also implies
an ethnic homogeneity that did not exist in 1900 and is certainly not
representative of the rapidly diversifying region it is today.
|
|