![]() |
Publications and Bibliographies | ![]() |
|
If you have any comments or suggestions about these informational postings, or any questions on cataloging which you would like answered, please send them to the Subject and Bibliographic Access Committee. The Committee is always looking for more questions for this monthly column. When "folklore" is used as a subdivision in a Library of Congress Subject Heading under a topic or ethnic group, does it refer to the folklore of the topic/ethnic group, or to folklore about the topic/ethnic group? A few years ago Library of Congress Subject Headings introduced the concept of a "form" subject subdivision, as opposed to a "topical" subject subdivision. The "form" subdivision is used to describe what the book IS; the "topical" subdivision is used to describe what the book is ABOUT. The difference is coded into the cataloging record. In MARC (the computer design used by libraries in the U.S.) what the book IS is coded into a subfield "v" in the subject heading, and what the book is ABOUT is coded into a subfield "x" in the subject heading. If your computer system used this coding to differentiate the subdivisions you could tell how the term was used. This having been said, there are instructions for assigning subject headings to folklore materials. Library of Congress instructs us to assign the following headings to books on folklore: $a [Ethnic, national, or occupational group] $z [place] $v Folklore .
(Example: $a Indians of North America $z Texas $v Folklore) $a Navajo Indians $v Folklore. (a subfield "v" is used because
the book IS their folklore, not ABOUT their folklore)
|
|